Why are logos getting simpler?

When designing a logo, it’s easy to go overboard. There are so many great elements you can work with (colors, textures, patterns, shapes, borders, typography, gradients, icons, etc.) that it’s tempting to include a little bit of everything to get your point across.

In a massively oversaturated media environment, however, a viewer simply doesn’t have enough attention to spare for complicated logos. A bold and simple logo can cut through the crap and be seen (and remembered), but a complex logo causes the viewer’s brain to simply ignore it.

It’s a defense mechanism to preserve attention because there just isn’t time to engage with everything trying to grab our attention. The more “stuff” you put into a logo, the less it will be seen and remembered.

For this reason, a key trend in logo design is to purge any unnecessary elements. New logos are almost always simpler and cleaner than those being replaced, and many rebranding efforts are essentially just simplifications of the existing visual identity.

Clients often get frustrated with designers constantly trying to simplify things, but there are valid explanations for why customers really do respond better to strong, simple designs.

Here are some recent rebranding examples from Brand New that show how companies are really beginning to understand the dramatic and powerful effect of simplicity on customer responsiveness and engagement:

Smith Electric Vehicles Logo, Before and After

 

Oni Press Logo, Before and After

 

TV Land Logo, Before and After

 

Coyote Logo, Before and After

 

Aetna Logo, Before and After

 

DC Comics Logo, Before and After

 

Jenny Logo, Before and After

 

Blip Logo, Before and After

Meanwhile, most of the highest-rated rebranding initiatives from last year showed a similar awareness of the power of streamlining and simplification:

Little Chef Logo, Before and After

 

Peru, Before and After

 

Starbucks Logo, Before and After

This last one, Starbucks, was one of the most noteworthy and dramatic rebranding initiatives of last year. It’s the next logical step in the company’s steady visual progression toward brand-focused simplicity.

Now, this certainly doesn’t mean that the perfect logo is just the name of the company set in Helvetica Bold. The logo still needs to represent the uniqueness and character of the brand as well as it possibly can, and it needs to offer some kind of visual interest. For example, here’s how Dulux incorporated their energetic, colorful spirit into their new logo:

Dulux Logo, Before and After

This trend towards simplicity means designers need to think like poets, not novelists. Instead of using every tool Adobe Illustrator offers and trying to convey every shred of meaning possibly in the logo, it makes more sense (cognitively and practically) to pare it down to the bare minimum.

What can you do with two visual elements instead of ten? What can you do with a single color instead of an entire palette? Does that font really need an outline, a bevel, a drop shadow, and rivets?

Even though going the simple route can make you feel a little naked (like you forgot to put on pants this morning), it makes complete sense when trying to of create a remarkable, memorable brand experience that will cut through the crap and get noticed by your target audience.

7 Responses to Why are logos getting simpler?

  1. The Starbucks logo in your header image appears to be a modified version (probably far from official because of the placement of the stars). I

  2. Good catch, Chris! We fixed it. :-)

  3. I would not call simplification of design a trend. What you’re saying here has been absolute truth and a basic design principle that is more a re-discovery of the web design first era in which we live. I’d liken it to other rediscoveries, where “grid based design” and attention to color are treated like grand frontiers, when it is just convergence of results.

    On the flip side, I’d say that we are experiencing the slide OUT of a trend of over-complication. The last decade has seen a huge influx of very bad branding practices borne of excitement of ink-independence; forget that ink itself was never the key component of the importance of simplicity.

  4. Bryan, that’s a great comment, and I was kind of wondering the same thing as well. We recently endured a pretty brutal Web 2.0-inspired period of “three-dimensionalization” of logos (of which UPS is probably the least objectionable example), and I’m glad to see that our industry seems to be correcting back the other way. And I love your point about ink not being the reason for simplicity. How easily we forget. :-)

  5. This is a great post on why logos should be simple. I completely agree though I did like the Peru logo more than the new one because I can’t even make out what it says now.

  6. Is this a trend or the tendency of Brand Recognition?

  7. Very nice, I love the new Aetna logo!

What do you think?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want your photo next to your comment? Just set up a Gravatar!

About James

I'm the Managing Director, which means my job's to keep the company moving forward. I do lots of new business development, marketing, operations, and strategy. I've also got plenty of hands-on experience with most of the areas Forty covers, so I can back up the rest of the team when needed. Meet James